Key result
Suprasternal transcatheter aortic valve replacement achieved 100% technical success and 98.8% 30-day survival, with 0% strokes and minimal complications.
Why the study?
A cohort of patients requiring TAVR are not suitable for a transfemoral approach, making the evaluation of alternative access routes necessary.
Does suprasternal transcatheter aortic valve replacement provide safe and effective outcomes in patients not suitable for transfemoral access?
Observational (n=84)
Yes
Does suprasternal transcatheter aortic valve replacement provide safe and effective outcomes in patients not suitable for transfemoral access?
Suprasternal TAVR is a safe and effective alternative access route with excellent 30-day survival and minimal complications for patients ineligible for transfemoral access.
SS-TAVR may be feasible for TF-ineligible patients; leaves open need for prospective multicenter validation.
Objectives To describe outcomes after suprasternal (SS) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as a new alternative access approach. Background There still remains a cohort of the TAVR population who are not suitable for a transfemoral (TF) approach. SS‐TAVR is a safe and effective alternative to TF‐TAVR and has now become our preferred alternative access route. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients from New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center and Princeton Baptist Medical Center who underwent SS‐TAVR from 2015 to July 2018. A total of 84 patients were included in the study. Results Technical success was achieved in all cases. Thirty‐day survival was 98.8% (n = 83). There were minimal complications. Most notably, there were no transient ischemic attacks or strokes (0%, n = 0). Reexploration for bleeding was 3.6% (n = 3), and major bleeding was 1.7% (n = 1). We also achieved satisfactory results with a mean aortic valve gradient of 6.07 ± 3.79 mmHg and an aortic valve area of 2.21 ± 0.51 cm2. No patients had anything more than mild paravalvular leak. The mean length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit was 1.42 ± 1.23 days, and hospital LOS was 4.20 ± 3.29 days. Conclusions SS access for TAVR is an extremely important technique to have in any valve team's alternative access armamentarium. This technique can be safely and reliably reproduced with any standard hybrid operating room setup and no additional equipment, and it can be used with any commercially available valve system. In the current experience, minimal complications and excellent early term results were obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eudailey et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Aortic valve disease requiring TAVR not suitable for transfemoral approach (n=84). Suprasternal transcatheter aortic valve replacement was evaluated on 30-day survival. Suprasternal transcatheter aortic valve replacement achieved 100% technical success and 98.8% 30-day survival, with 0% strokes and minimal complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: