Key result
Environmental exposure to asbestos or erionite resulted in similar rates of pericardial involvement in patients with malignant mesothelioma (45.5% vs 44.4%, respectively).
Why the study?
What is the prevalence of pericardial involvement detected by echocardiography in patients with malignant mesothelioma exposed to asbestos or erionite?
Observational (n=42)
What is the prevalence of pericardial involvement detected by echocardiography in patients with malignant mesothelioma exposed to asbestos or erionite?
Absolute Event Rate: 45.5% vs 44.4%
Pericardial involvement is common (45.2%) in patients with malignant mesothelioma, regardless of whether the exposure was to asbestos or erionite, and is not related to tumor stage.
Echocardiographic screening for pericardial involvement may merit consideration in malignant mesothelioma; Level 4 data leaves open prospective validation and practice change.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pericardial involvement in patients with malignant mesothelioma caused by exposure to different minerals. METHODOLOGY: Forty-two patients (mean age of 52 +/- 12 years) with malignant mesothelioma were examined with transthoracic echocardiography. Thirty-three (78.9%) patients had a history of environmental exposure to asbestos and nine (21.4%) had a history of environmental exposure to erionite. RESULTS: In 19 (45.2%) patients with malignant pericardial mesothelioma, pericardial involvement was determined by echocardiography. The other 23 (54.8%) patients had no pericardial involvement. Pericardial effusion was detected in nine (64.3%) patients and pericardial effusion was small in six (14.3%) patients, moderate in one (2.4%) patient and large in two patients. Thickening of the pericardium was observed in eight (19%) patients. In another two (7.1%) patients pericardial calcification was observed. Among the 33 patients who had been exposed to asbestos, 15 (45.5%) had pericardial involvement, and among the nine patients with a history of exposure to erionite, four (44.4%) had pericardial involvement. There was no difference in terms of pericardial involvement in different stages of the tumour (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pericardial involvement is commonly seen in patients with malignant mesothelioma. Among patients exposed to asbestos or zeolite there was no difference in terms of pericardial involvement. Furthermore, pericardial involvement was not related with the stage of the tumour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shehu et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Malignant pleural mesothelioma (n=42). Environmental exposure to asbestos vs. Environmental exposure to erionite was evaluated on Pericardial involvement. Environmental exposure to asbestos or erionite resulted in similar rates of pericardial involvement in patients with malignant mesothelioma (45.5% vs 44.4%, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: