Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational modeling study demonstrates improved predictive accuracy and stability for landslide susceptibility assessment, highlighting the value of balancing sample credibility with spatial...
Landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA) plays a crucial role in the prevention and control of landslide disasters, and selection of negative-sample directly affects the model prediction performance of models. Previous methods encounter difficulty in simultaneously considering sample credibility and spatial uniformity, which restricts the ability of models to learn non-landslide features and affect the accuracy. To address this issue, this study proposes a negative sampling method based on credibility and spatial-uniformity (CSUN). This method first divides landslide feature spaces using K-means clustering, and uses a Gaussian similarity function to measure the environmental similarity between each clustering unit and landslide samples, constructing a negative sample credibility map and selecting negative samples accordingly. Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models were used to compare CSUN with random and credibility-only sampling methods. The results show that: (1) Compared with random and credibility-only negative-sample selection schemes, the proposed strategy improved the AUC by 20.5% and 8.7% under the RF model, and by 12.3% and 6.5% under the SVM model. (2) Repeated sampling analysis demonstrates that CSUN produced the lowest standard deviations of AUC and F1-score, indicating the most stable performance. The proposed approach improves the prediction accuracy of the models and provides an effective strategy for constructing reliable and spatially uniform landslide negative samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: