Observational analysis reveals rising corporate Party-building among Chinese private enterprises, indicating evolving state-business ties toward Party-state capitalism.
Academics study various measures of political connections, but mostly for robustness checks and endogeneity tests. Little attention has been given to whether these measures differ meaningfully. I argue that state–business relations adapt to changing political environments, and the forms of connections change. Studying Party branches in firms and Party-building adopted in corporate charters, I highlight three results. First, private firms are increasingly connected through Party branches and Party-building. Second, these forms of connections have increasingly dominated strategic industries. Third, many firms have become less reliant on lobbying. This study has implications for cronyism, state capitalism, Party-state capitalism, and Chinese politics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Youngjoon Lee (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: