Cross-sectional study observes frequent psychotropic medication and polypharmacy among children in protective care, highlighting widespread treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
BACKGROUND: Children in the care of child protective services are treated with psychotropic medication at rates that far exceed those seen in the general population. OBJECTIVE: This study documents the rates of psychotropic medication use among school-aged children in two groups: 1) foster care; and 2) residential care. Socio-demographic variables and mental disorders that predict psychotropic medication use, polypharmacy (≥2 medication), and multiclass polypharmacy (≥3 medication classes) were also examined. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: The sample consisted of children aged 5 to 12 years in foster care (n = 125) and residential care (n = 106) in the province of Quebec (Canada). METHODS: Caregivers reported the children's medication use and completed questionnaires on the children's symptoms and diagnoses. RESULTS: Children in foster care and residential care showed few differences, with the exception of two specific medications (antipsychotic and clonidine). Fifty-nine percent of all children in the sample were prescribed psychotropic medication. The majority (93%) of these children received at least one ADHD medication. Polypharmacy was common, with 21% of all children being prescribed more than one medication. Multiclass polypharmacy was rare. Unique predictors of psychotropic medication usage included male sex, cumulative adversity and a diagnosis of ADHD. Polypharmacy was predicted by diagnoses of ADHD, Tourette's Syndrome and of an eating disorder. The rarity of multiclass polypharmacy (n = 5/231) limited inferential analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to better understand the high rates of ADHD diagnosis and ADHD-medication among children in the care of child protective services, particularly given that ADHD medications account for most prescriptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parizeau et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: