Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative interview study uncovers politically driven labor insecurity among journalists in a hybrid regime, suggesting political control reshapes professional standards and practices.
Precarity has become a defining feature of the contemporary journalistic labor market worldwide. Drawing on 20 in-depth interviews with journalists in Serbia, we explore the tension between precarity and professional journalistic aspirations. Although participants understood precarious working conditions primarily in economic terms (e.g., low wages and limited job opportunities), their accounts suggest that labor (in)security is distributed according to political rather than market logic. Some respond to these pressures by adopting nondemocratic journalistic practices or by adjusting their professional values, while others embrace precarity as a mark of professional integrity and a condition for practicing journalism in a hybrid regime.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Išpanović et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: