Mixed-methods analysis reveals persistent computational training deficits in undergraduate biology curricula, highlighting substantial misalignment with bioscience workforce hiring demands.
To prepare students for emerging research technologies and careers in the life sciences, computational thinking and skills are increasingly essential in undergraduate biology programs. However, curricular change has not kept pace with the evolving demands of the biosciences workforce. At an independent, nonprofit research institute operating at the intersection of genetics and genomics and spanning academic research and biotechnology sectors, we observe a growing need for trainees and early-career scientists with both biological and computational expertise. To examine the alignment between workforce expectations and undergraduate preparation, we analyzed job descriptions at our institute over time and interviewed and surveyed faculty across the country to collect perspectives on undergraduate biology curricula. Our findings indicate that computational skills are increasingly emphasized in entry-level life science positions, while undergraduate biology curricula do not consistently reflect these expectations. Faculty reported persistent gaps in bioinformatics, computational biology, and data science, as well as barriers that constrain curricular updates. By comparing workforce expectations with faculty-reported challenges, this study provides insight into feasible pathways for integrating computational thinking and skills within existing curricular structures to better prepare students for careers in the biosciences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerace et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: