Key result
UDPA4 score predicts DOAC-related bleeding better than HAS-BLED with a validation AUC of ~0.77.
Why the study?
The study aimed to construct and validate a nomogram-based scoring model to predict all-cause bleeding risk in geriatric Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation-related ischemic stroke treated with DOACs.
Cohort (n=1,251)
No
Effect estimate: AUC 0.768 (95% CI 0.706-0.830)
The novel UDPA4 scoring system provides a more accurate, individualized prediction of 90-day bleeding risk than existing scores (HAS-BLED, ORBIT, ATRIA) for geriatric Chinese patients with NVAF-IS receiving DOACs.
May support bleeding risk stratification with UDPA4 in this population; leaves open external validation and outcome impact.
This study aimed to construct and validate a user-friendly nomogram-based scoring model for predicting the risk of all-cause bleeding in geriatric patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation-related ischemic stroke (NVAF-IS) treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in a rivaroxaban-predominant Chinese single-center. This real-world cohort study was conducted on 1943 consecutive hospitalized geriatric patients with NVAF-IS who received DOACs (predominantly rivaroxaban) therapy. Risk factors were identified using four feature-selection methods: lasso regression, random forest, Boruta algorithm, and backward stepwise regression. A nomogram-based scoring model was developed and evaluated for discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. In this rivaroxaban-predominant single-center cohort (rivaroxaban 88.89%, edoxaban 6.55%, dabigatran 4.56%), a total of 1251 participants were ultimately included, of whom 920 were used for model development and 331 for temporal validation. Seven risk factors were identified: uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior bleeding, anemia, concomitant antiplatelet drugs use, age, and albumin. A nomogram-based UDPA 4 score and a software-based risk calculator were constructed specifically for geriatric Chinese patients with NVAF-IS receiving DOACs (predominantly rivaroxaban), and demonstrated good discrimination (derivation AUC = 0.824; validation AUC = 0.768), calibration, and clinical utility. Our model outperformed the widely used ORBIT (AUC = 0.632), ATRIA (AUC = 0.663), and HAS-BLED (AUC = 0.630) scores in this specific population. Subgroup analyses were conducted in adults ≥ 75 years old, patients without prior bleeding, and patients receiving rivaroxaban. Sensitivity analysis was performed with age and albumin as continuous variables. All analyses achieved acceptable model performance. This study developed and validated, for the first time, a clinical risk score and a software-based risk calculator specifically for elderly Chinese patients with NVAF-IS receiving DOACs in a rivaroxaban-predominant single-center cohort. Our findings may facilitate individualized bleeding risk assessment in this specific population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation-related ischemic stroke (NVAF-IS) (n=1,251). UDPA4 score vs. ORBIT, ATRIA, and HAS-BLED scores was evaluated on All-cause bleeding event (AUC 0.768, 95% CI 0.706-0.830). The novel UDPA4 nomogram-based scoring system demonstrated good discrimination for predicting all-cause bleeding in geriatric Chinese patients with NVAF-IS receiving DOACs, with a validation AUC of 0.768, outperforming ORBIT, ATRIA, and HAS-BLED scores.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: