Autoethnographic inquiry reveals persistent native-speakerist tensions in an educational linguist, highlighting the divide between multilingual advocacy and English-medium instruction.
Positioned at the crossroads of multilingualism in theory and English-Medium Instruction (EMI),or more broadly English-Medium Education (EME), in practice, this autoethnographic inquiry gives voice to feelings and beliefs that had begun slipping into silence as my professional identity solidified. It examines my positioning as a female Italian researcher within Educational Linguistics and considers how my trajectory might inform broader understandings of EMI teacher identity. Drawing on a multimodal personal archive, I trace the emergence of three interwoven personas: a phonophilic self, a multilingual advocate, and an ancestral echo. The dialogue among these personas reveals how native-speakerist ideologies remain embodied in my practice, not only through residual prestige-oriented beliefs but also through a sustained, affective fascination with the sounds of English. This tension complicates the multilingual stance promoted in Educational Linguistics, exposing a gap between the ideology I profess and the monoglossic (and monophonic) practices I often enact. For EMI, the analysis suggests that embracing a pedagogy of discomfort can create space for more honest, discipline-sensitive reflections on language, identity, and legitimacy. Taken together, these insights illuminate a single individual’s trajectory, offered not as a model but as an invitation for others to reflect on the multilingual selves shaping their own academic lives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michela Gronchi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: