Retrospective cohort study demonstrates low rates of severe withdrawal and no naloxone events under a short-acting opioid protocol, indicating preliminary safety for hospitalized patients.
Background Hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder commonly experience undertreated withdrawal, leading to increases in patient-directed discharge and readmission. Short-acting opioids can mitigate withdrawal in patients who are unwilling to trial buprenorphine or methadone, or need additional symptom control during up-titration.Objectives This study assessed the safety and efficacy of a short-acting opioid protocol for opioid withdrawal.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder who received a short-acting opioid protocol for withdrawal with intravenous hydromorphone or oral oxycodone. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe withdrawal. Secondary endpoints included naloxone use, patient-directed discharge, and length of stay. A paired cohort was analyzed where patients’ hospital outcomes were compared pre- versus post-protocol.Results Naloxone use after protocol initiation was 0% and severe withdrawal occurred in one patient (1%). The patient-directed discharge and 30-day readmission rates were 38% and 30%, respectively. Fifty-one percent of patients had a prior hospitalization within two years without use of the short-acting opioid protocol and were included in the paired cohort analysis. The pre- versus post-protocol patient-directed discharge rate was 47% vs. 43% (p = 0.774) and length of stay was 3 vs. 5 days (p = 0.180).Conclusions Our findings provide preliminary evidence for the safety of a short-acting opioid protocol for opioid withdrawal. There was no significant difference in patient-directed discharge rate or length of stay in the paired cohort of patients’ encounters with or without short-acting opioid protocol use. Larger studies are necessary to draw conclusions regarding safety and efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sauers et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: