Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Material evaluation reveals superior stiffness and lower emissions for ramie-reinforced PETG in simulated drone wings, highlighting a sustainable pathway for high-performance unmanned aircraft.
This study presents an innovative evaluation of natural fiber-reinforced PET and PETG composites for UAV wing structures operating under NEOM wind conditions, defined by a mean wind speed of 5.6 m/s and peak gusts of 12 m/s. Aerodynamic analysis demonstrated a stable lift-to-drag ratio of 15.8 across the operating range, while lift increased quadratically from 1.75 N at 3 m/s to 77.95 N at 20 m/s. Thrust demand remained nearly constant between 4.79 and 4.85 N, indicating efficient propulsion stability under variable airflow conditions. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making framework was developed to rank candidate materials using specific stiffness (40%), specific strength (30%), and carbon footprint (30%). The results established a clear performance hierarchy led by Ramie/PETG, which achieved the highest overall score through exceptional specific stiffness of 35.5 GPa·cm 3 /g and a low carbon footprint of 1.64 kg CO 2 e/kg. Ramie/PET ranked second, delivering the highest tensile strength of 372.6 MPa together with strong specific stiffness of 29.4 GPa·cm 3 /g. The PETG matrix consistently surpassed PET because of its higher modulus (1.95 vs 1.094 GPa), lower density (1.27 vs 1.60 g/cm 3 ), and narrower carbon footprint range. These findings identify Ramie/PETG as the preferred solution for UAV wings requiring maximum flutter resistance, while Ramie/PET is recommended where peak structural strength is the primary design objective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abderraouf Gherissi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: