Theoretical analysis reveals an aperiodic binary sequence with Abelian-bordered long factors, demonstrating that Abelian-bordered factors do not imply Abelian periodicity.
Charlier, Harju, Puzynina and Zamboni asked whether an infinite word whose sufficiently long factors are all Abelian bordered must be Abelian periodic. We give a negative answer over the binary alphabet. The construction combines a four-height periodic nearest-neighbor path with sparse finite replacement walks. The resulting binary word is not Abelian ultimately periodic, although every factor of length at least 141 has an Abelian border. Exact finite certificates verify the periodic palette, all 28 replacement blocks, the five-witness contamination bound and a finite sparse-prefix positive control. Status: Public Beta; internally verified candidate proof; external mathematical review pending.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carptopus (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: