Key result
Systolic blood pressure exhibited a U-shaped association with all-cause mortality in atrial fibrillation, with the lowest risk at 134 mmHg versus 120 mmHg (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.86-0.98).
Why the study?
Hypertension carries high attributable risk for AF and influences outcomes, but optimal blood pressure targets in AF remain poorly defined.
What is the dose-response relationship between systolic and diastolic blood pressure and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Meta-Analysis (n=476,750)
What is the dose-response relationship between systolic and diastolic blood pressure and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Relative Risk: 0.92 (95% CI 0.86–0.98)
A target SBP of 120-130 mmHg and DBP above 75-80 mmHg optimizes the balance between stroke prevention, bleeding risk, and survival in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Supports SBP targets of 120-130 mmHg in AF to balance risks; extends dose-response evidence for guideline refinement and trials.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hypertension carries the highest attributable risk for atrial fibrillation (AF) and strongly influences clinical outcomes such as stroke and death; however, the optimal blood pressure targets in individuals with AF remain poorly defined. We aimed to characterise the dose-response relationship between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and ischaemic stroke, all-cause mortality, and intracranial haemorrhage. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus for studies reporting outcomes in AF stratified by SBP and DBP. A two-stage dose-response meta-analysis used restricted cubic splines to model non-linearity, with within-study correlation handled by the Greenland-Longnecker method. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies (17 cohorts; n = 476,750) were included. SBP demonstrated a U-shaped association with all-cause mortality, with the lowest risk at 134 mmHg (RR 0.92, 0.86-0.98 versus 120 mmHg). DBP exhibited a J-shaped association, with the lowest risk at 83 mmHg (RR 0.99, 0.97-1.02). In contrast to mortality, the risks of ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, and stroke or systemic embolism rose progressively with SBP, with a steepening gradient. At 140 versus 120 mmHg, the RR was 1.51 for intracranial haemorrhage against 1.08 for ischaemic stroke, reaching 1.99 versus 1.14 at 150 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Systolic blood pressure exhibits a U-shaped relationship with all-cause mortality in patients with AF, balancing against a monotonic increase in ischemic stroke and intracranial haemorrhage at higher pressures. A pragmatic target SBP of 120-130 mmHg with DBP kept above approximately 75-80 mmHg, appears to optimize the balance between stroke prevention, bleeding risk, and survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahmohamadi et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in atrial fibrillation (n=476,750). Systolic blood pressure vs. 120 mmHg was evaluated on all-cause mortality (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.98). Systolic blood pressure exhibited a U-shaped association with all-cause mortality in atrial fibrillation, with the lowest risk at 134 mmHg versus 120 mmHg (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.86-0.98).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: