Comparative physiological and transcriptomic analysis reveals enhanced antioxidant activity and stress signaling in mutant wheat, highlighting targets for resilient crop breeding.
Drought stress poses a major threat to global wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity by impairing physiological processes and inducing oxidative damage. Mutation breeding provides a valuable approach to generate novel genetic variation and identify stress-tolerant germplasms. In this study, phenotypic, physiological, and transcriptomic analyses were integrated to elucidate the drought adaptation mechanisms of a gamma-ray-induced mutant wheat line, PL6, alongside its wild-type parent, PL1. Under osmotic stress and soil drought conditions, PL6 exhibited an enhanced germination rate and higher photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm). Furthermore, PL6 maintained lower malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation, which was supported by elevated activities of antioxidant enzymes including SOD, APX, and CAT. Time-series transcriptomic analysis via WGCNA and GSEA revealed that PL6 actively maintains environmental sensing, transmembrane transport, and photosynthetic processes under PEG-induced osmotic stress. Conversely, pathways associated with the cell cycle and DNA metabolism were transiently suppressed. To isolate key regulatory genes without computational bias, a multi-algorithm machine learning framework—combining Random Forest, LightGBM, and LASSO—was applied to variance-stabilizing transformed (VST) expression profiles. This approach successfully identified 45 consensus core drought-responsive genes enriched in targeted protein turnover, redox balance, cell wall restructuring, and lipid metabolism, from which ten representative candidate genes were experimentally validated via qRT-PCR. Collectively, this study demonstrates an effective analytical framework for selection of high-confidence transcripts, providing candidate targets for future targeted gene editing and molecular breeding in wheat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: