In vitro study shows laser-activated SWEEPS irrigation maximizes smear layer clearance and sealer bond strength in curved root canals, suggesting improved apical seal integrity.
This study evaluated and compared four irrigation activation protocols—conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), and shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS)—with 17% EDTA as a final irrigant, with respect to smear layer (SL) removal and push-out bond strength (PBS) of root canal sealer in the apical third of curved root canals. One hundred and twenty extracted single-rooted human premolars with oval canals and moderate curvature (20–40°, Schneider’s method) were allocated into four groups randomly (n = 30 each). Canals were prepared crown-down under 2.5% NaOCl irrigation, followed by final 17% EDTA irrigation per the assigned protocol: CSI, PUI, PIPS, and SWEEPS. 10 specimens per group underwent SEM evaluation of SL removal using Hülsmann’s criteria; remaining specimens were obturated. In 10 samples, apical sealer adaptation was assessed via SEM. PBS of ten samples were evaluated using a universal testing machine, followed by failure mode assessment. Data were statistically evaluated using two-way mixed ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for PBS and Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple-comparison test with Bonferroni correction for SL scores (p < 0.05). Minimum SL removal was exhibited by the apical third of Group 1 (CSI-EDTA) samples. PIPS-EDTA and SWEEPS-EDTA presented comparable SL elimination outcomes in the cervical and middle thirds (p > 0.05). SL elimination between these two groups was significantly different in the apical third. The cervical section of Group 4 displayed the highest bond integrity. However, the lowest bond strength was exhibited by the apical third of Group 1 (CSI-EDTA). SWEEPS combined with EDTA demonstrated superior smear layer removal throughout curved root canals, including the apical third, and yielded the highest push-out bond strength among all tested irrigation protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aljamhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: