Key result
Pulmonary artery catheterization was associated with lower short-term (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.86) and long-term mortality (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.41-0.97) in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Why the study?
Does pulmonary artery catheterization reduce short- and long-term mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock?
Cohort (n=129)
No
Does pulmonary artery catheterization reduce short- and long-term mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock?
Pulmonary artery catheterization is associated with improved short- and long-term survival in patients with cardiogenic shock, particularly those without acute coronary syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports PAC use in cardiogenic shock; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: The impact of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) on survival in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) is not well established. This study aimed to assess whether Swan-Ganz catheter monitoring is related to short- and long-term mortality in patients with CS. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive patients with a first admission for CS were prospectively enrolled in a single-center registry between December 2005 and May 2009, and were subsequently followed up over 5.3 years. RESULTS: PAC was used in 64% of all patients with a mean age of 68 years (65% men). After adjustment for age, gender and the presence of CS upon admission, PAC was associated with lower short-term mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.86, p = 0.008] as well as lower mortality rates in the long-term follow-up (HR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.97, p = 0.035). In a subgroup analysis, the use of PAC was associated with reduced mortality in patients without acute coronary syndrome (ACS), i.e. 49% in the Swan-Ganz group vs. 82% (p = 0.010), but there was no difference within the ACS group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PAC in patients with CS was associated with lower short- and long-term mortality rates after adjustment for age, gender and the presence of shock upon admission. This benefit was only significant in those patients without ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosselló et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Cardiogenic shock (n=129). Pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) vs. No pulmonary artery catheterization was evaluated on Short-term mortality (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.86, p=0.008). Pulmonary artery catheterization was associated with lower short-term (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.86) and long-term mortality (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.41-0.97) in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: