Methodological framework establishes machine-readable, testable ethical declarations for AI agents, highlighting regulatory alignment with the EU AI Act.
Most AI agents ship with ethics that exist only as marketing copy or as instructions buried in a proprietary system prompt: unpublished, unversioned, and unverifiable. Meanwhile, the EU AI Act has made specific forms of machine influence illegal — manipulative and exploitative practices are prohibited since February 2025 — turning "our agent is ethical" from a slogan into a claim that regulators can test. We present Ethyka, an open standard (CC BY 4.0) that turns an AI agent's ethics into machine-readable, testable files. Three core files declare the agent's full conversational and agentic behavior: ethics.md, the agent's constitution (identity, truthfulness, incentives, vulnerable groups, priority order); manipulation.md, a catalog of banned undue-influence techniques, each with an identifier, a banned/allowed boundary, and a runtime signal; and intent.md, the limits of the agent's autonomy (mandate, no goals of its own, controlled initiative, prohibited harmful intent). A conditional extension, robotics.md (v1.0), adds 19 physical-safety clauses for embodied agents; its eleven-clause core (v0.9) is developed in depth in a companion paper. Every clause carries a stable identifier, a severity with precedence semantics, and an adversarial test hook; a verification methodology derives at least two attack scenarios per clause at three pressure levels. Declarations are discoverable at a well-known URI. We describe the design, its regulatory mapping (EU AI Act Articles 5, 14, 50), and its limitations: a declaration is not compliance, and verification — not declaration — is where the work lies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedro Diezma (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: