Theoretical analysis demonstrates NP-hardness and provides approximation schemes for b-matching interdiction on undirected trees, revealing tractable computational boundaries.
In this paper, we consider a network optimization interdiction problem, called the [Formula: see text]-matching interdiction problem on undirected trees with unit edge weights. Given an undirected tree [Formula: see text], each vertex [Formula: see text] has a capacity [Formula: see text], the [Formula: see text]-matching of [Formula: see text] is an edge subset [Formula: see text] such that the number of edges in [Formula: see text] incident to [Formula: see text] is at most [Formula: see text] for each [Formula: see text]. A maximum [Formula: see text]-matching is a [Formula: see text]-matching that contains the largest number of edges among all possible [Formula: see text]-matchings. In this paper, we consider two problems: (1) The [Formula: see text]-matching edge interdiction problem. Each edge of [Formula: see text] has an interdiction cost. Each vertex of [Formula: see text] has a capacity. There is also an interdiction budget. The goal is to remove a subset of the edges constrained to a budget such that the size of maximum [Formula: see text]-matching in the resulting graph is minimized. (2) The [Formula: see text]-matching vertex interdiction problem. Each vertex of [Formula: see text] has an interdiction cost and a capacity. There is also an interdiction budget. The goal is to remove a subset of the vertices constrained to a budget such that the size of maximum [Formula: see text]-matching in the resulting graph is minimized. We first show that both problems are NP-hard. Then, we propose several pseudo-polynomial time dynamic programming algorithms and fully polynomial time approximation schemes for both problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: