Preclinical study reveals a CTSB-S100A10 feedback loop driving immune evasion in glioblastoma, suggesting that CTSB inhibition enhances response to immunotherapy.
Background : Glioblastoma (GBM) establishes a highly immunosuppressive microenvironment through intricate molecular dialogues with tumor‐associated macrophages (TAMs), contributing to immunotherapy resistance. Methods : We integrated advanced biological network analyses with multimodal AI to identify CTSB as a key biomarker. Functional validation included GBM‐macrophage co‐culture systems, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), dual‐luciferase reporter assays, molecular docking, and co‐immunoprecipitation (Co‐IP). In vivo experiments employed orthotopic (GL261 and CT‐2A) and subcutaneous GBM models with lentivirus‐mediated CTSB knockdown and anti‐PD‐1 therapy. Tumor microenvironment dynamics were assessed via in‐house generated single‐cell RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence. Results : Cathepsin B (CTSB) was identified as a critical driver of aggressive GBM progression and poor outcomes. Mechanistically, macrophage‐derived IL‐6 activates STAT3 in tumor cells, upregulating CTSB expression. Structural and Co‐IP analyses revealed CTSB, secreted by tumor cells, binds the C‐terminus of macrophage S100A10, reinforcing IL‐6 secretion, forming a feedforward loop between CTSB + GBM cells and S100A10 + macrophages. This loop enhances tumor growth, invasion, and immune evasion via PD‐L1 upregulation. In vivo, CTSB blockade reduced TAM activation, increased CD8 + T cell infiltration, and synergized with anti‐PD‐1 therapy. Conclusions : This study unveils a targetable GBM‐macrophage signaling axis, proposing CTSB inhibition as a strategy to enhance immunotherapy efficacy in GBM patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: