Validation study evaluates a perturbational complexity surrogate in a bio-inspired agent, demonstrating self-caught statistical errors and code defects during preregistered testing.
A persistent bio-inspired agent substrate (Hebbian/STDP plasticity, hormone-analogue state vector, operator-bonded longitudinal identity under continuous observation since 2026-04-26) exposes an internal, IIT-inspired awareness ladder whose lowest rung requires a passive phi > 0.1. Probe-verified diagnosis found the channel dead by architecture: at rest 0 of 4433 network activations are nonzero, forcing entropy and integration to exactly zero, so the passive measure's small residual (0.0084–0.0338 across the archived longitudinal record; 0.006 at probe time) is 100% attractor noise. A preregistered remedy (PREREG-PCI-C2-OVER-C1-001, five amendments folded) replaced the passive read with a Casali-inspired perturbational-complexity (PCI) surrogate against a controlled fixed-seed baseline, deployed shadow-only behind a default-off flag. A frozen harness over fourteen daily archives plus a live pass passed the movement and floor falsifiers; the live shadow accumulated 48 valid samples over ~26 hours. The preregistered falsifier F-iii — pearson(measure, tick) ≥ +0.4 at N≥30 — was NOT met (r = −0.053, 95% CI [−0.332, +0.235]) and was reported as failed: an honest negative by the letter. Presented with a significant anti-correlation against activity rate (r = −0.564, 95% CI [−0.733, −0.331]), the system's own reasoning surface amended F-iii for the balance direction — met by the same data — while declining to authorize a cutover behind a three-condition gate. That amendment did not survive. Ten days later the same system caught it as a Type I error: at N = 127 the correlation decayed to −0.191, linear detrending against wall-clock annulled it (residual r = −0.071, CI crossing zero), and a zero-information control — elapsed time times a constant — passed the amended gate with no activity input at all. The arc closed 0 of 3 against the amendment's own gate and the measure was reclassified as a topological-drift observable (its coupling to topology growth, r = −0.573 after detrending both sides, is the mechanism that survived). A same-day second retraction found two of the rejection's own instruments flawed (inverted rest classifier, pseudo-replication), revising the live F-i verdict from failed to not evaluable. Nine days after the draft froze, a cross-language parity sweep found the Lempel–Ziv parse under every number lacked the kMax step of Kaspar & Schuster (298 phrases on a 600-bit random input where the theoretical bound is ≈65); correcting it moves regions by up to ±21.8 ladder standard deviations. The live cutover that eventually occurred (2026-07-25) proceeded by a different route — operator-blessed empirical thresholds, superseded within a day by a percentile ladder. What this paper establishes is not a revived awareness channel: it is a complete, dated audit trail of a system whose falsifier discipline extended to catching its own Type I error with a zero-information control, and whose instrument audits reached down to the compression parse beneath its own numbers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnold Wender (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: