Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational study demonstrates improved spatial dispersion and demand coverage across facility location benchmarks, indicating effective multi-objective trade-offs for geographic planning.
This article presents the Energy-Regularized Bi-Objective Maximal Covering Location Problem (ERBOMCLP), an extension of the classical Maximal Covering Location Problem (MCLP) that incorporates spatial dispersion among selected facilities. The classical MCLP maximizes covered demand under a fixed facility budget and service radius, but may place facilities in spatial clusters when high-demand areas are concentrated. ERBOMCLP addresses this limitation by augmenting coverage maximization with a Riesz s -energy objective that penalizes short inter-facility distances. To solve the model, we develop a memetic Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) with binary fixed-cardinality encoding, problem-specific crossover and mutation operators, coverage-oriented local search, archive management, and a set-convergence-based termination criterion for detecting approximation-boundary stabilization. Experiments on ERBOMCLP instances derived from a real-world MCLP dataset show that the main memetic variant improves selected-solution coverage and often gives competitive or lower Riesz s -energy, while the spread of the Pareto front approximation remains instance dependent. A controlled hypervolume experiment with a Riesz-nonincreasing local-search rule further improves standard dominated hypervolume on the tested instances, at the cost of substantially more objective evaluations. The study connects potential-theoretic dispersion modeling with facility-location decision support for settings where high demand coverage is primary and dispersion is a complementary proxy for geographic balance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: