Mathematical analysis reveals dimensional barriers to transforming stable replicator equilibria into evolutionarily stable strategies, indicating exact obstructions starting at three strategies.
Stefano Allesina asked whether every globally stable interior equilibrium of a replicator equation becomes an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) after a common-payoff shift and positive projective rescaling. This preprint gives an exact obstruction theory and determines the dimensional threshold. For a specified full-support equilibrium, an ESS-equivalent representative exists exactly when there is no nonzero positive-semidefinite matrix (Y) with (Y 1=0) and(diag(YA)≥ 0). The result is a simplex-tangent specialization of the classical Barker–Berman–Plemmons/Gordan–Stiemke alternative and yields normalized primal and dual semidefinite margins. Every globally asymptotically stable full-support equilibrium of a two-strategy game is already an ESS. A three-strategy integer example has a globally asymptotically stable uniform equilibrium but cannot be made an ESS under any allowed equivalence. This example is degenerate, has exactly two Nash equilibria, and is zero-margin, so it is consistent with Allesina's generic three-strategy theorem. Explicit positive-parameter counterexample families are given for every number of strategies (n≥3). Theunconditional threshold is therefore three strategies, while the first ambient-open failures occur at four. A strict four-strategy competitive Lotka–Volterra construction is certified using Jansen permanence and the Baigent–Hou split-Lyapunov condition. Exact Schur-complement and eigenpair-preserving perturbations lift the strict certificate to ambient-open counterexample sets in every (n≥4). These sets contain models with entrywise-positive competitive interaction matrices and infinitely many pairwise nonproportional rational and integer payoff matrices. The deposit includes the article, an exact-arithmetic SymPy verifier, and its machine-readable JSON output. No empirical data are used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
K. Fathi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: