Key result
Anaesthetic specialists with a period of training in rural/regional areas were more likely to subsequently practise in rural areas compared to those who did not (based on a 53% survey response rate).
Why the study?
Does a period of anaesthetic training at rural and regional hospitals improve recruitment to rural areas among new consultant anaesthetists?
Cross-Sectional (n=326)
Yes
Does a period of anaesthetic training at rural and regional hospitals improve recruitment to rural areas among new consultant anaesthetists?
Providing anaesthetic training opportunities in rural and regional hospitals is associated with a higher likelihood of specialists subsequently practicing in rural areas.
Rural training exposure was associated with higher rural practice rates; leaves open whether expanding programs improves recruitment.
The provision of specialist anaesthetic services to rural and remote locations in Australia poses an ongoing challenge. Initiatives to improve delivery of specialist anaesthetic services include the provision of anaesthesia training opportunities at rural hospitals. Previous surveys of trainees demonstrated the positive effect of rural training on attitudes toward subsequent practice in rural areas. We aimed first to survey attitudes of specialist anaesthetists towards anaesthetic training at rural and regional hospitals. We then compared the current workplace of those who had experienced a period of training at rural/regional hospitals versus those who did not. A web-based survey was distributed to fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists who had commenced consultant practice in the preceeding five years. Six hundred and fifteen surveys were distributed with a response rate of 53%. Respondents held their rural training experience in high regard. Anaesthetic specialists with a period of training in rural/regional areas were more likely to subsequently practise in rural areas compared to those who did not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dooney et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Specialist anaesthetists (n=326). Training at rural and regional hospitals vs. No training at rural/regional hospitals was evaluated on Subsequent practice in rural areas. Anaesthetic specialists with a period of training in rural/regional areas were more likely to subsequently practise in rural areas compared to those who did not (based on a 53% survey response rate).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: