Key result
Tirofiban combined with aspirin and heparin reduced the risk of ischaemic complications in over 7200 patients with acute coronary syndromes across three major international trials.
Why the study?
Does tirofiban reduce ischaemic complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Does tirofiban reduce ischaemic complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, reduces the risk of ischemic complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes when added to aspirin and heparin.
May support tirofiban addition to aspirin and heparin in ACS; leaves open optimal integration with modern dual antiplatelet therapy.
Platelet activation and aggregation play an important and essential role in the formation of intracoronary thrombus in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). ACS still carries unacceptably high rates of morbidity and mortality despite intensive antianginal therapy and the wide use of aspirin and heparin. Two glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors are now licensed for concomitant use with heparin and aspirin in ACS. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors block the final step for platelet aggregation and fibrinogen binding, thus preventing thrombus formation. Tirofiban is a potent, synthetic, non-peptide and specific glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor. In three major international trials involving over 7200 patients (PRISM, PRISM-PLUS and RESTORE), tirofiban was shown to be well tolerated and to reduce the risk of ischaemic complications in patients with unstable angina, non-Q-wave myocardial infarction and high-risk patients undergoing revascularisation when used in combination with aspirin and heparin. These and ongoing studies are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomma et al. (2000) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndromes (n=7,200). Tirofiban was evaluated on Ischaemic complications. Tirofiban combined with aspirin and heparin reduced the risk of ischaemic complications in over 7200 patients with acute coronary syndromes across three major international trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: