Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CuMn 2 O 4 and CoMn 2 O 4 spinels were facilely synthesized by oxidation–precipitation and subsequent heat treatment at relatively low temperature. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO x demonstrates that NO x conversions in CuMn 2 O 4 with (111) plane (CuMn 2 O 4 -C) and in CuMn 2 O 4 -C with (311) plane (CuMn 2 O 4 -T) are more than 90% at 200 and 300 °C, respectively, which are superior to those in CoMn 2 O 4 -C and CoMn 2 O 4 -T. CuMn 2 O 4 -C and CoMn 2 O 4 -C exhibit higher absorption amounts of NH 3 /NO and more oxygen vacancies than CuMn 2 O 4 -T and CoMn 2 O 4 -T, respectively. In addition, CuMn 2 O 4 -C displays high catalytic activity and good stability in NH 3 -SCR in the presence of 100 ppm of SO 2 and 10 vol % H 2 O. In situ diffuse reflection infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy results indicate the coexistence of Eley–Rideal and Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanisms in CuMn 2 O 4 -C, and the Eley–Rideal mechanism is predominant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: