Key result
Percutaneous catheter pericardiocentesis was successful in 96% of cases (49 of 51 patients) with cardiac tamponade, with no major complications.
Why the study?
Is percutaneous catheter pericardiocentesis safe and effective for the management of cardiac tamponade?
Observational (n=51)
No
Is percutaneous catheter pericardiocentesis safe and effective for the management of cardiac tamponade?
Percutaneous catheter pericardiocentesis is a highly successful and safe first-line management strategy for cardiac tamponade.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change tamponade management; leaves open confirmation of safety and efficacy in prospective studies.
Cardiac tamponade is a cardiological emergency requiring prompt treatment in order to avoid a fatal outcome. It can complicate a number of medical conditions and it is important, therefore, that all practitioners are aware of its presentation, diagnosis and management. These are outlined. We suggest that, with certain specific and important exceptions, percutaneous catheter pericardiocentesis is to be recommended in the management of cardiac tamponade. We include a review of 51 consecutive cases treated at our own institution. Catheter pericardiocentesis was successful in 49 (96%) cases and 36 (80%) patients did not require any further intervention. There were no major and only two minor complications which required no additional treatment. We review previous literature concerning percutaneous pericardiocentesis. Using recommended procedures, pericardiocentesis is successful in 90-100% of cases and major complications are rare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ball et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Cardiac tamponade (n=51). Percutaneous catheter pericardiocentesis was evaluated on Successful catheter pericardiocentesis. Percutaneous catheter pericardiocentesis was successful in 96% of cases (49 of 51 patients) with cardiac tamponade, with no major complications.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: