Key result
DMA-135 inhibits EV-A71 replication by stabilizing a ternary complex with AUF1 and the SLII IRES domain, while viral evolution under DMA-135 selective pressure yields resistant mutations that disrupt this interaction.
Why the study?
Selective pressures on positive-strand RNA viruses provide opportunities to establish target site specificity and mechanisms of action of antivirals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Viral evolution under selective pressure from DMA-135 reveals that the small molecule inhibits EV-A71 by targeting the SLII bulge loop and stabilizing a ternary complex with AUF1, which is disrupted by resistance mutations.
Selective pressures on positive-strand RNA viruses provide opportunities to establish target site specificity and mechanisms of action of antivirals. Here, Enterovirus-A71 revertant viruses with resistant mutations in the SLII IRES domain (SLII resist ) were selected at low doses of the antiviral DMA-135. The EV-A71 revertant viruses were resistant to DMA-135 at concentrations that robustly inhibit replication of wild-type virus. EV-A71 IRES structures harboring the suppressor mutations induced efficient expression of reporter Luciferase mRNA in the presence of non-cytotoxic doses of DMA-135 whereas DMA-135 dose-dependently inhibited Luciferase expression from the wild-type IRES element. NMR studies indicate that the resistant mutations change the structure of SLII at the bulge loop binding site of DMA-135 and at part of an extended surface recognized by host RNA-binding protein AUF1. Comparisons of biophysical analysis of complexes formed between AUF1, DMA-135, or either SLII or SLII resist show that DMA-135 stabilizes a ternary complex with AUF1-SLII but not AUF1-SLII resist . Further studies demonstrate that the hnRNP A1 protein retains binding affinity for SLII resist , illustrating that DMA-135 inhibition and viral resistance do not perturb the SLII-hnRNP A1 arm of the regulatory axis. Taken together, this work demonstrates how viral evolution under selective pressures of small molecules can elucidate RNA binding site specificity, mechanisms of action, and provide additional insights into the viral pathways inhibited by the antiviral DMA-135.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davila‐Calderon et al. (2023) studied Enterovirus-A71 infection. DMA-135 vs. Vehicle / Wild-type virus was evaluated on Viral replication and IRES-dependent translation. DMA-135 inhibits EV-A71 replication by stabilizing a ternary complex with AUF1 and the SLII IRES domain, while viral evolution under DMA-135 selective pressure yields resistant mutations that disrupt this interaction.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: