Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report the results of a randomized study to elucidate whether addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to immunosuppressive therapy is valuable for the treatment of severe aplastic anemia (SAA) in adults. A total of 101 previously untreated patients (median age, 54 years; range, 19 to 75 years) were randomized to receive antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporin A (CyA) (G-CSF- group) or ATG, CyA, and G-CSF (G-CSF+ group). In the G-CSF+ group, the hematologic response rate at 6 months was higher (77% vs 57%; P = .03) than in the G-CSF- group. No differences were observed between the groups in terms of the incidence of infections and febrile episodes. There were no differences between the G-CSF- group and the G-CSF+ group in terms of survival (88% vs 94% at 4 years), and the development of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute leukemia (AL) (1 patient vs 2 patients). However, the relapse rate was lower in the G-CSF+ group compared with the G-CSF- group (42% vs 15% at 4 years; P = .01). Further follow-up is required to elucidate the role of G-CSF in immunosuppressive therapy for adult SAA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teramura et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: