Key result
Ischemic preconditioning and calcium preconditioning completely prevented ventricular fibrillation during reperfusion compared to a 33.3% incidence in control rat hearts (p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does ischemic or calcium preconditioning reduce reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in isolated rat hearts?
Does ischemic or calcium preconditioning reduce reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in isolated rat hearts?
Calcium plays an important role in the antiarrhythmic effect of ischemic preconditioning during reperfusion in isolated rat hearts.
Supports calcium's role in preconditioning against reperfusion VF in rats; leaves open translation to clinical settings.
We investigated the relationship between the effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and Ca(2+) preconditioning (CPC) on reperfusion-induced arrhythmias. In the control group (noPC), Langendorff-perfused rat hearts were subjected to 5-min zero-flow global ischemia (I) followed by 15-min reperfusion (I/R). In ischemic preconditioning groups (IPC), the hearts were subjected to three cycles of 3-min global ischemia and 5-min reperfusion. In the CPC group, the hearts were exposed to three cycles of 3-min perfusion of higher Ca(2+) (2.3 mmol/l Ca(2+)) followed by 5-min perfusion of normal 1.3 mmol/l Ca(2+), and the hearts were then subjected to I/R. Verapamil was administered in several hearts of the IPC group (VR+IPC). Ventricular arrhythmias upon reperfusion were less frequently seen in the IPC and CPC groups than in the noPC and VR+IPC groups. IPC and CPC could attenuate conduction delay and enhance shortening of the monophasic action potential duration during ischemia. The ventricular fibrillation threshold measured at 1-min reperfusion was significantly higher in the IPC and CPC groups than in the noPC and VR+IPC groups. Verapamil completely abolished the salutary effects of IPC. These results demonstrate that Ca(2+) plays an important role in the antiarrhythmic effect of IPC during reperfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2000) studied Reperfusion-induced arrhythmias (n=82). Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) vs. No preconditioning (5-min global ischemia followed by 15-min reperfusion) was evaluated on Incidence of ventricular fibrillation during reperfusion (p=<0.05). Ischemic preconditioning and calcium preconditioning completely prevented ventricular fibrillation during reperfusion compared to a 33.3% incidence in control rat hearts (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: