Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two new constitutive models formulated within the framework of kinematic hardening plasticity are presented and their implementation into a finite-element program is described. The models are extensions of two existing constitutive models for reconstituted clays and introduce a number of kinematic surfaces within the modified CAM clay bounding surface. The new key feature of the models is a hardening modulus which results in a smooth variation of stiffness with strain, from the high elastic value, within the first kinematic surface, to the value on the bounding surface. Other features include a mathematical formulation of the models in general stress space to facilitate their implementation into a finite-element program, a variety of shapes of the yield and plastic potential surfaces in the deviatoric plane, and the novel concept of changing the active yield surface, which is necessary for the consistent formulation and implementation of the models into a finite-element code. The models are shown to have the ability to reproduce realistically the observed nonlinear prefailure behavior of overconsolidated clays in the small strain range.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grammatikopoulou et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: