Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consideration of momentum conservation within a hydraulic jump leads to the conclusion that both the momentum correction due to the nonuniform mean velocity profile and the depth-averaged turbulent normal stress are important mechanisms. A model is constructed where the turbulent stresses are approximated with a simplified algebraic stress model. These stresses are shown to depend primarily on the vertical gradient of the longitudinal velocity. An estimate for the jump velocity distribution is then obtained from a moment of momentum equation. A single new term in the St. Venant momentum equation, combining the turbulent stress and velocity distribution effects, in terms of the depth and depth-averaged velocity is proposed. The new jump momentum flux term is nonlinear and diffusive in character. With an appropriate calibration of a single coefficient, the model gives good results for the location, length, and profile of hydraulic jumps ranging in Froude numbers from 2 to 7. The numerical results are obtained from a finite-element model with and without numerical dissipation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: