Key result
Endovascular aneurysm repair did not acutely increase aortic characteristic impedance (102.3 vs 133.8 dynes s/cm5, p=0.06), but significantly increased the systolic reflected wave, altering wave timing and increasing left ventricular hydraulic load.
Why the study?
Does EVAR endograft deployment acutely alter aortic mechanics and left ventricular function in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Observational (n=18)
No
Does EVAR endograft deployment acutely alter aortic mechanics and left ventricular function in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Absolute Event Rate: 102.3% vs 133.8%
p-value: p=0.06
EVAR acutely alters the timing of reflected aortic waves, increasing systolic reflection and LV hydraulic load, which may mechanistically explain long-term adverse cardiovascular effects despite no acute increase in aortic impedance.
Alerts to possible acute LV load rise post-EVAR; leaves open clinical relevance in human outcomes.
Increased pulse-wave velocity (PWV) entails elevated arterial stiffness and is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Previous studies have shown PWV increases following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Animal models suggest elevated PWV following endograft deployment occurs in conjunction with decreased aortic compliance and increased aortic impedance. This could lead to unwanted effects on left ventricular (LV) function. This study evaluates the early implications of EVAR on aortic mechanics and associated LV function. Prospective observational study of elective EVAR for abdominal aneurysm. Transesophageal echocardiography was used to acquire LV flow and function, as well as images of the ascending aorta. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) software analysis allowed for determination of aortic volume change throughout the cardiac cycle. Aortic mechanics (including compliance, impedance and reflected wave analysis) and left-ventricular function (including cardiac output, hydraulic load and diastolic function) were measured pre- and post-endograft deployment. Endograft deployment resulted in no significant increase in aortic impedance. It did alter the timing of reflected waves in the aorta, with a greater positive wave being reflected during systole. This increased the hydraulic load on the LV with corresponding statistically non-significant trends for decreasing cardiac output and LV diastolic function. STE represents an emerging imaging modality for aortic biomechanical assessment. The increased PWV seen following EVAR may not reflect the same aortic biomechanical pathophysiology as in the non-surgical population with measures of increased arterial stiffness. The stiffer endograft does not appear to acutely increase aortic impedance, though it does alter the timing of reflected waves which may have negative effects on LV function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gregory et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=18). Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs. Pre-EVAR baseline was evaluated on Aortic characteristic impedance (Z0) (p=0.06). Endovascular aneurysm repair did not acutely increase aortic characteristic impedance (102.3 vs 133.8 dynes s/cm5, p=0.06), but significantly increased the systolic reflected wave, altering wave timing and increasing left ventricular hydraulic load.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: