Finite-element analysis demonstrates distinct stiffness behaviors between active and passive load-transfer curves in pile groups, highlighting the need for loading-specific design methods.
Two-dimensional (2D) finite-element analyses were carried out to study undrained soil deformation around piles displaced laterally through soil. The load-transfer p -δ curves produced were found to be applicable for design during passive lateral loading but not for active lateral loading of pile groups. The p -δ curves characterize the local soil-shear deformation around the pile, whereas p - y curves used in the subgrade-reaction method of active lateral-pile-loading design also include the effects of global soil displacement. Hence, determination of p - y curves from basic soil parameters requires consideration of both the local and global soil behavior and the pile-group geometry and loading. Because p -δ curves stiffen with reducing pile spacing, whereas active load-transfer curves soften, there is a significant stiffness disparity between the two forms of load-transfer curves for closely spaced pile groups. Care should be taken in choosing the appropriate form of reaction curve for design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. F. Bransby (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: