Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The cloudiness in simulated Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) pixels deduced from the Advanced Very‐High‐Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) satellite imager is studied specifically in meteorologically sensitive areas during the Fronts and Atlantic Storm‐Track Experiment. It is found that few clear AVHRR observations are located in the IASI pixels in these regions, which are covered by high‐level and low‐level clouds. The IASI channel selection is then studied in the context of the sensitive areas for the pixels with low‐level clouds. The Entropy Reduction (ER) method, which was previously studied in a general context, is compared with two other channel selection methods using selection criteria based on adjoint sensitivity: the sensitivity to observations and the so‐called Kalman‐filter sensitivity. It is found that, even though the ‘sensitive’ methods give slightly better results than the ER one, the latter performs quite robustly and at a lower computational cost. The robustness to the specification of the background‐error covariance matrix is then studied. It is shown that channel selection based on the ER method is particularly robust to the specification of the background‐error covariance matrix, but the analysis step itself requires an accurate determination of the background‐error covariance matrix. In addition it is shown that an independently computed constant channel set gives comparable results to the optimal channel set.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fourrié et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: