Nylon 6 has been toughened by rubber particles that were dispersed within the matrix via additives that physically interact with the elastomer phase but chemically react with the polyamide phase. To disperse a core‐shell impact modifier having a poly(methyl methacrylate) or PMMA shell, most of the work presented is based on the use of a styrene/acrylic acid copolymer containing 8 wt% acrylic acid, SAA8. SAA8 is miscible with PMMA and should located in the PMMA grafted chains of the impact modifier while chemically reacting with the nylon 6 matrix; hence, it should aid in both the dispersal and strenghtening the modifier‐matrix interface. Microscopy and mechnical properties confirm that SAA8 does function in this way but less effectively than styrene/maleic anhydride copolymers, which are also miscible with PMMA but evidently react more effectively with the polyamides. The use of ethylene/acrylic acid copolymer for dispersal of the coreshell impact modifier and a styrene/ethylene‐butene/styrene block copolymer in nylon 6 was also briefly considered. Low‐temperature toughness of the blends proved to be a much more critical test of the effectiveness of such additives than room temperature impact strenght.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: