Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lymphocyte transformation test has often been used as an in vitro test for nickel allergy. We have previously demonstrated the presence of nickel-reactive T cells in individuals with no history of allergic disease and with a negative patch test towards NiSO4. In this study, we show that this proliferative response was mainly confined to T cells within the CD4+ subset. In contrast to conventional recall antigens such as tetanus toxoid, in vitro stimulation using NiSO4 activated both FACS-purified CD4+CD45RA+ 'naive' and CD4+CD45RO+ 'memory' T cells. To determine which cell population reacted with nickel to induce T cell activation, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were separated into macrophages and non-adherent, HLA-DR-depleted T cells. We found that preincubation of monocytes/macrophages but not T cells with NiSO4 resulted in subsequent T cell proliferation. This result demonstrated that nickel did not exhibit any direct effect on the T cell. Furthermore, the NiSO4-induced T cell proliferation could be blocked by antibodies towards MHC class II (HLA-DR) molecules. Our results substantiate the concept that individuals with a negative patch test towards NiSO4 contain in their peripheral blood T cells capable of recognizing nickel or nickel-modified peptides. In contrast to conventional recall antigens, both memory and naive T cells were activated. Thus, when compared with data obtained from nickel-allergic individuals, this study shows a comparable nickel-inducible T cell activation in non-allergic individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lisby et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: