Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature regarding the role of biologics in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Review, ClinicalTrials.gov. REVIEW METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on clinical studies investigating the efficacy of emerging biologics in CRSwNP, with a focus on randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be promising evidence to support the safety and efficacy of biologics in CRSwNP with and without asthma for select patients. However, additional large-scale randomized studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine which patients would benefit the most from these novel systemic treatments. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis refractory to medical and surgical therapy remains a challenging clinical problem for otolaryngologists. However, emerging biologic therapies may offer a new therapeutic option for such patients with recalcitrant disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: