Key result
Preclinical studies suggest that ghrelin administration attenuates inflammatory responses, reduces organ injury, and improves survival in animal models of radiation combined injury.
Why the study?
Does ghrelin improve survival and reduce organ injury in animal models of radiation combined injury?
Does ghrelin improve survival and reduce organ injury in animal models of radiation combined injury?
Ghrelin shows promise as a potential therapy for radiation combined injury by attenuating systemic inflammation and organ damage through vagus nerve activation.
Should not change practice in radiation injury; hypothesis-generating for ghrelin pending human trials.
The threat of nuclear terrorism has led to growing worldwide concern about exposure to radiation. Acute radiation syndrome, or radiation sickness, develops after whole-body or a partial-body irradiation with a high dose of radiation. In the terrorist radiation exposure scenario, however, radiation victims likely suffer from additional injuries such as trauma, burns, wounds or sepsis. Thus, high-dose radiation injuries and appropriate therapeutic interventions must be studied. Despite advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of radiation injury, very little information is available on the therapeutic approaches to radiation combined injury. In this review, we describe briefly the pathological consequences of ionizing radiation and provide an overview of the animal models of radiation combined injury. We highlight the combined radiation and sepsis model we recently established and suggest the use of ghrelin, a novel gastrointestinal hormone, as a potential therapy for radiation combined injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacob et al. (2010) conducted a review in Radiation Combined Injury (RCI). Ghrelin was evaluated. Preclinical studies suggest that ghrelin administration attenuates inflammatory responses, reduces organ injury, and improves survival in animal models of radiation combined injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: