Why the study?
Does ventricular pacing induce reciprocal beating in patients with bradycardia and intact antegrade A-V conduction?
Does ventricular pacing induce reciprocal beating in patients with bradycardia and intact antegrade A-V conduction?
In patients with bradycardia and intact antegrade A-V conduction, ventricular pacing can induce reciprocal beating, making demand pacing preferable to fixed-rate pacing to avoid vulnerable phase stimulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observations link ventricular pacing to reciprocal beats; leaves open whether demand pacing is preferable in bradycardia with intact AV conduction.
Ventricular pacing is frequently associated with retrograde ventriculo-atrial conduction. In the absence of atrioventricular (A-V) block, the relatively intact antegrade A-V conduction system supplies the necessary pathway for a re-entry mechanism that may become operative in the presence of delayed retrograde conduction. Two patients with bradycardia and unimpaired antegrade A-V conduction exhibited reciprocal (echo) beating following nodal beats before ventricular pacing was instituted. After the introduction of an artificial ventricular pacemaker, reciprocal beats followed the paced ventricular beats in both patients. These observations suggest that a similar mechanism is involved in the production of reciprocal beats linked to impulses originating from the A-V node and the ventricles. When ventricular pacing is indicated for the treatment of bradycardia in the presence of intact antegrade A-V conduction, a situation which may produce echo beats, demand pacing is considered preferable to fixed-rate pacing as the latter may deliver a stimulus into the vulnerable phase following an echo beat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barold et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: