Why the study?
Does nailing in situ provide good long-term radiological and clinical outcomes in patients with slipped upper femoral epiphysis?
Does nailing in situ provide good long-term radiological and clinical outcomes in patients with slipped upper femoral epiphysis?
Nailing in situ for slipped upper femoral epiphysis with slipping angles ≤30 degrees provides excellent long-term clinical and radiological outcomes at 30 years.
Supports favorable 30-year outcomes after in situ nailing for mild slips; leaves open whether moderate slips differ significantly.
We reviewed the radiological and clinical long-term results after the nailing in situ of slipped upper femoral epiphysis in 59 hips in 43 patients. The displacement of the epiphysis had been measured as the 'slipping angle' before operation and related to the results at follow-up at a mean of 30.9 years (27 to 34). The mean age at follow-up was 44.2 years (39 to 50). Radiographic re-examination of 41 hips with slipping angles of < or =30 degrees at the time of operation showed that eight (20%) had developed mild osteoarthritis and one had severe changes. For 18 hips with slipping angles ranging from 31 to 50 degrees at surgery six (33%) had mild osteoarthritis and three had severe changes. The differences did not quite achieve statistical significance (p = 0.09). Clinical re-examination of the 41 hips with slipping angles of < or =30 degrees showed fair or poor results (Harris hip score <90) in three (7%). In the 18 hips with slipping of 31 to 50 degrees, four had fair or poor results (22%) (p = 0.13). We conclude that nailing in situ for slipping of < or =30 degrees, using one thin nail, can give excellent long-term results. At present we recommend that hips with slips ranging from 31 to 50 degrees should also be nailed in situ, but further long-term studies are required, especially on the choice between nailing in situ and corrective osteotomy for slips in excess of 50 degrees.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansson et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: