Key result
Vaxfectin adjuvant was dose sparing and significantly improved neutralizing and binding antibody responses to the measles virus H and F DNA vaccine, leading to protection from disease but not infection.
Why the study?
Does Vaxfectin adjuvant improve antibody responses to a DNA vaccine encoding measles virus H and F proteins in juvenile rhesus macaques?
Does Vaxfectin adjuvant improve antibody responses to a DNA vaccine encoding measles virus H and F proteins in juvenile rhesus macaques?
Vaxfectin adjuvant is dose-sparing and substantially improves the antibody response to the H+F DNA vaccine in macaques, leading to protection from disease but not infection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports preclinical measles DNA vaccine development in primates; leaves open human translation and efficacy trials.
DNA vaccines formulated with the cationic lipid-based adjuvant Vaxfectin induce protective immunity in macaques after intradermal (i.d.) or intramuscular (i.m.) delivery of 0.5 to 1 mg of codon-optimized DNA encoding the hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins of measles virus (MeV). To characterize the effect of Vaxfectin at lower doses of H+F DNA, rhesus macaques were vaccinated twice with 20 μg of DNA plus Vaxfectin i.d., 100 μg of DNA plus Vaxfectin i.d., 100 μg of DNA plus Vaxfectin i.m. or 100 μg of DNA plus phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) i.m. using a needleless Biojector device. The levels of neutralizing (P = 0.036) and binding (P = 0.0001) antibodies were higher after 20 or 100 μg of DNA plus Vaxfectin than after 100 μg of DNA plus PBS. Gamma interferon (IFN-γ)-producing T cells were induced more rapidly than antibody, but were not improved with Vaxfectin. At 18 months after vaccination, monkeys were challenged with wild-type MeV. None developed rash or viremia, but all showed evidence of infection. Antibody levels increased, and IFN-γ- and interleukin-17-producing T cells, including cells specific for the nucleoprotein absent from the vaccine, were induced. At 3 months after challenge, MeV RNA was detected in the leukocytes of two monkeys. The levels of antibody peaked 2 to 4 weeks after challenge and then declined in vaccinated animals reflecting low numbers of bone marrow-resident plasma cells. Therefore, Vaxfectin was dose sparing and substantially improved the antibody response to the H+F DNA vaccine. This immune response led to protection from disease (rash/viremia) but not from infection. Antibody responses after challenge were more transient in vaccinated animals than in an unvaccinated animal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2013) studied Measles virus infection (n=13). Vaxfectin-formulated DNA vaccine encoding measles virus H and F proteins vs. 100 µg PBS-formulated DNA was evaluated on Neutralizing antibody levels (p=0.036). Vaxfectin adjuvant was dose sparing and significantly improved neutralizing and binding antibody responses to the measles virus H and F DNA vaccine, leading to protection from disease but not infection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: