Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates humoral responses to measles vaccines, suggesting significant differences in immunity.
Introduction As measles incidences increase globally, it is imperative to elucidate the features of a protective humoral response. Methods In this study, a phage-display immunoprecipitation sequencing technology, VirScan, was employed to evaluate viral epitope coverage by antibodies raised to infection of rhesus macaques with wild-type (WT) measles virus (MeV), or after vaccination with a live-attenuated MeV vaccine (LAMV), the triple measles mumps rubella vaccine (MMR) or a novel recombinant MeV hemagglutinin protein-based vaccine (rMeVH). Vaccinated animals were also challenged with WT MeV to measure antibody epitope reactivity during a recall. Results The results demonstrate that WT MeV infection elicited antibodies with a broader epitope reactivity profile than LAMV-containing vaccines. The rMeVH vaccine not only resulted in a narrow H-protein specific antibody profile, but induced specificities that were distinct from those induced to WT MeV or LAMV. All vaccinated animals expanded the breadth of their MeV-specific antibody binding repertoires following WT MeV challenge. The MeV-specific VarScore, a measure of overall antigen-binding, was positively correlated with total IgG titers assessed by ELISA, avidity, and neutralizing titer. Conclusion These results demonstrate the large effects of vaccination platforms on the breadth and fine-specificity of anti-measles induced humoral responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: