Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study reveals high infection rates in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, indicating an urgent need for prophylaxis.
Triple-class–exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is associated with cumulative immunosuppression and heightened infection risk. In this longitudinal, retrospective, observational study, US claims data from the Komodo Healthcare Map (KHM; n = 2702; median follow-up, 9.5 months) and the All-Payer Claims Data (APCD; n = 1755; median follow-up, 14.9 months) were used to assess infection burden in patients with TCE RRMM receiving non-bispecific antibody therapies after ≥4 prior lines of therapy (LOTs). The study period was from 1/1/2016 through 10/31/2024. Median (range) index LOT number was 5 (5–5; KHM) and 5 (5–6; APCD); median (interquartile range) age was 67.0 (60–75; KHM) and 71.0 (64–77; APCD) years. Across datasets, the weighted average rate for any infection was 63.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.2–65.8), with the most common infection type being bacterial (58.2%), then viral (27.4%) and fungal (8.2%). Severe infections occurred in 46.1% of patients (95% CI, 44.1–48.1). Cumulative infection rates increased from 49.5 (26 weeks) to 66.4% (52 weeks); cumulative severe infection rates increased from 31.5 to 44.9%, respectively. These findings demonstrate substantial real-world infection burden in heavily pretreated patients with TCE RRMM receiving non-bispecific antibody and non–CAR-T therapies, underscoring the need for infection prophylaxis and supportive care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hadidi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: