Key result
Among 94 randomly selected aseptic meningitis samples, nonpolio enteroviruses were detected by RT-PCR in 7.4% of cases, with a significantly higher positivity rate among neonates (p≤0.05).
Why the study?
Viral meningitis is the most common meningitis type, with nonpolio enteroviruses accounting for 23%-60% of cases worldwide, prompting detection of NPEV via RT-PCR and evaluation against clinical and laboratory parameters.
Does RT-PCR reliably detect NPEV compared to clinical and laboratory findings in patients with aseptic meningitis?
Observational (n=2,519)
Yes
Does RT-PCR reliably detect NPEV compared to clinical and laboratory findings in patients with aseptic meningitis?
RT-PCR is reliable for identifying NPEV in aseptic meningitis, highlighting its utility over inconclusive clinical and laboratory findings.
Supports heightened NPEV suspicion in neonatal aseptic meningitis; leaves open RT-PCR's broader diagnostic role without prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Viral meningitis is the most common type of meningitis. Worldwide, nonpolio enteroviruses (NPEVs) account for 23%-60% of all cases of viral meningitis. We aimed to detect NPEV among aseptic meningitis cases using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and evaluate molecular testing versus clinical and laboratory parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 2-year prospective study was conducted for all clinically suspected meningitis patients, who underwent lumbar puncture in Alshatby University and Alexandria Fever Hospitals. Clinical manifestations were reviewed; cytological, microbiological, and biochemical examinations were done. One-step RT-PCR for NPEV was introduced to a routine workflow using Pan-Enterovirus primers. RESULTS: Out of 2519 patients, 994 (40%) patients were found to have positive cerebrospinal fluid findings, out of which 716 (72%) patients had positive findings of aseptic meningitis. Ninety-four samples were randomly selected and divided across four age groups: neonates, infants, children, and adults. The significant difference was found among adult patients regarding fever, vomiting, headache, signs of meningeal irritation, cranial nerve affection, and focal neurological deficits (p ≤ .05). Seven cases (7.4%) were found to be NPEV positive by RT-PCR. Positive NPEV PCR samples were shown to be statistically significant among neonates (p ≤ .05). The statistical significance was found among the NPEV group regarding the length of hospital stay and duration of IV antibiotic intake while no statistical significance was found with any clinical or laboratory findings. CONCLUSION: RT-PCR was reliable to identify NPEV while clinical and laboratory findings were inconclusive. NPEV showed low incidence and slight seasonal variation which rings the bell to investigate other causes of viral meningitis throughout the year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raouf et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Aseptic meningitis (n=2,519). RT-PCR for nonpolio enterovirus (NPEV) detection vs. Clinical and laboratory findings was evaluated on NPEV positivity by RT-PCR. Among 94 randomly selected aseptic meningitis samples, nonpolio enteroviruses were detected by RT-PCR in 7.4% of cases, with a significantly higher positivity rate among neonates (p≤0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: