Key result
The DAPT-SHOCK-AMI trial is designed to evaluate whether intravenous cangrelor improves 30-day outcomes compared to crushed ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.
Why the study?
Cardiogenic shock alters medication pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, but the clinical benefits of cangrelor have not been evaluated in randomised trials of patients with CS-AMI.
Does intravenous cangrelor improve clinical outcomes compared to crushed ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing primary angioplasty?
RCT (n=550)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does intravenous cangrelor improve clinical outcomes compared to crushed ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing primary angioplasty?
The DAPT-SHOCK-AMI trial will be the first randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous cangrelor versus crushed ticagrelor in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No change to DAPT in AMI shock until results; extends randomized cangrelor-ticagrelor comparison to cardiogenic shock.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a devastating and fatal complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). CS can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications. The unique properties of cangrelor make it the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor for CS-AMI, in terms of both efficacy and safety. The DAPT-SHOCK-AMI trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03551964; EudraCT: 2018-002161-19) will assess the benefits of cangrelor in patients with an initial CS-AMI undergoing primary angioplasty. This randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial of approximately 550 patients (with an allowed 10% increase) in 5 countries using a double-blind design will compare initial P2Y12 inhibitor treatment strategies in patients with CS-AMI of (A) intravenous cangrelor and (B) ticagrelor administered as crushed tablets at a loading dose of 180 mg. The primary clinical endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke within 30 days. The main secondary endpoints are (1) the net clinical endpoint, defined as death, MI, urgent revascularisation of the infarct-related artery, stroke, or major bleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria; (2) cardiovascular-related death, MI, urgent revascularisation, or heart failure; (3) heart failure; and (4) cardiovascular-related death, all (1-4) within 1 year after study enrolment. A platelet reactivity study that tests the laboratory antiplatelet benefits of cangrelor, when given in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy, will be conducted using vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation. The primary laboratory endpoints are the periprocedural rate of onset and the proportion of patients who achieve effective P2Y12 inhibition. The DAPT-SHOCK-AMI study is the first randomised trial to evaluate the benefits of cangrelor in patients with CS-AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moťovská et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (n=550). Cangrelor vs. Ticagrelor administered as crushed tablets at a loading dose of 180 mg was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke within 30 days. The DAPT-SHOCK-AMI trial is designed to evaluate whether intravenous cangrelor improves 30-day outcomes compared to crushed ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: