Key result
Adding Levosimendan to dobutamine in cardiogenic shock with weaning failure improved 30-day successful inotrope withdrawal compared to dobutamine alone (OR 4.99; 95% CI 2.65-9.38; p<0.001).
Why the study?
The role of levosimendan in managing cardiogenic shock remains debated, and its effects when combined with dobutamine in patients refractory to dobutamine weaning required examination.
Does adding levosimendan to dobutamine improve successful inotrope withdrawal in patients with cardiogenic shock refractory to dobutamine weaning?
Cohort (n=349)
Does adding levosimendan to dobutamine improve successful inotrope withdrawal in patients with cardiogenic shock refractory to dobutamine weaning?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adding levosimendan to dobutamine in patients with cardiogenic shock who fail initial dobutamine weaning significantly improves the success of inotrope withdrawal and reduces 30-day mortality.
Background The role of Levosimendan in managing cardiogenic shock remains the subject of debate. Objective This study examines the use and effects of Levosimendan when combined with dobutamine in patient’s refractory to dobutamine weaning. Methods This retrospective study included patients with cardiogenic shock admitted between January 1st, 2010, and October 31st, 2022. After initial dobutamine weaning failure, we compared patients who were treated with dobutamine alone versus those for whom Levosimendan was added in top of dobutamine. The primary outcome was successful inotrope withdrawal, defined as survival without catecholamine support, transplant, or definitive ventricular assist device at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality at 30 and 90 days. Data analysis used inverse probability weighting according to propensity score. Results Among 349 patients with cardiogenic shock and failure to withdraw dobutamine, Levosimendan was used on top of dobutamine in 114 patients, and another try of dobutamine alone was made in 235 patients. At 30 days, successful inotrope withdrawal occurred in 46 (43.4%) patients with Levosimendan and dobutamine versus 24 (10.5%) patients of the dobutamine only group (weighted OR 4.99 [2.65 - 9.38]; p<0.001), with similar results at 90 days (weighted OR 6.16 [3.22-11.78]; p<0.001). Levosimendan + dobutamine was associated with lower 30-day mortality (weighted OR 0.47 [0.26-0.84]; p=0.01), with no difference at 90 days (weighted OR= 0.67 [0.39-1.14]; p=0.14). Conclusion Adding Levosimendan to dobutamine may improve inotrope withdrawal success and reduce 30-day mortality in patients with initial weaning failure, especially in those without project of cardiac assistance or transplant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeitouni et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Cardiogenic shock refractory to dobutamine weaning (n=349). Levosimendan added to dobutamine vs. Dobutamine alone was evaluated on Successful inotrope withdrawal, defined as survival without catecholamine support, transplant, or definitive ventricular assist device at 30 days (OR 4.99, 95% CI 2.65-9.38, p=<0.001). Adding Levosimendan to dobutamine in cardiogenic shock with weaning failure improved 30-day successful inotrope withdrawal compared to dobutamine alone (OR 4.99; 95% CI 2.65-9.38; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: