Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This case study assessed the effects of hybrid telepractice and in-person delivery of the Smooth Speech Treatment (Craig, 2010) for a school-aged child who stutters. Method The participant was an 8-year-old child who stuttered. Telepractice or in-person delivery were randomly assigned to treatment sessions in a single-subject AB design. The primary outcome measures were the percentage of syllables stuttered in conversation and reading probes taken at the beginning and end of each treatment session. Communication attitudes were measured before treatment began and at a posttreatment maintenance session. The pattern of treatment gains by delivery platform was also evaluated. Results Visual inspection of trends for outcome measures supported an association between the overall treatment package and a reduction in syllables stuttered. Pre- to post- treatment measures indicated an improvement in the child's attitudes toward stuttering. Within-session gains for telepractice sessions were more variable than in-person sessions. Conclusions These results indicate that fluency treatment delivered using a blend of telepractice and in-person delivery can be effective for a school-aged child who stutters. The findings align with prior studies showing the effectiveness of telepractice-delivered treatment for preschool children and adolescents. Replications of these results are needed with additional school-aged participants. Additional research is also warranted on factors that contribute to the variability of telepractice treatment effects for school-aged children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryer et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: