Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mammalian spermatozoa must undergo a preparation period known as capacitation to become capable of fertilizing oocytes. Controlled amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide anion (O2.-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) have been shown essential for capacitation and acrosome reaction. The presence of an oxidase in the sperm plasma membrane has been suggested. The objective of the present study was to provide evidence for the production of O2.- by capacitating cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Percentages of capacitation and acrosome reaction were determined by the chlortetracycline assay. The effect of several nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase inhibitors on capacitation was also studied. H2O2 production was determined by the fluorometric assay using the p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid-horseradish peroxidase system. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 480 nm. Heparin-dependent capacitation was inhibited by all NADPH oxidase inhibitors tested (p < 0.05). Significant levels of H2O2 were produced during capacitation with heparin; such production was inhibited by diphenyleneiodonium, one of the NADPH oxidase inhibitors. The addition of catalase to the incubation medium failed to modify the capacitation rate; inhibition was only observed when SOD was present (p < 0.05). Endogenous SOD activity was diminished during heparin-dependent capacitation (p < 0.05). Similar levels of acrosome reaction induced by lysophosphatidylcholine were obtained in both heparin and O2.--dependent capacitation. Overall results suggest the participation of a sperm oxidase in bovine sperm capacitation. H2O2, generated by O2.- dismutation, failed to participate in capacitation, although this ROS may have been able to decrease endogenous SOD activity. Exogenous O2.- promotes physiological capacitation in cryopreserved bovine sperm, thus allowing the acquisition of fertilizing capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Flaherty et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: