Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates robust 3D printability and high beta-carotene retention in zein-guar gum Pickering emulsions, highlighting their utility for targeted nutraceutical delivery.
This work introduces a zein-guar gum (ZNP-GG) food-grade stabilizing system for high internal phase Pickering emulsions (HIPPEs) designed for lipophilic bioactive encapsulation and 3D printing. Zein nanoparticles exhibited strong positive surface charge (+41.7 ± 2.8 mV), progressively neutralized through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic association with guar gum, forming stable, non-covalent complexes with nearly neutral ζ-potential. Compared to emulsions stabilized solely by ZNPs, ZNP-GG complexes retained comparable emulsifying activity (≈16–17 m 2 /g) but showed markedly higher emulsifying stability due to steric and viscoelastic reinforcement from GG. HIPPEs (defined by an internal oil volume fraction (ϕ int ) > 0.74) fabricated using these complexes showed physical stability (TSI = 2.31) after 14 days of storage at ambient temperature and fine droplet size (~17 μm), forming highly elastic, shear-thinning, and partially thixotropic networks suited for extrusion printing. Increasing GG concentration from 0.3% to 0.7% ( w / v ) enhanced structural rigidity, with hardness (110.8 g) and gumminess (86.4 g) rising significantly. The emulsions demonstrated environmental resistance to temperature (20–80 °C), ionic strength (0–500 mM NaCl), pH (2.00–10.00), and three freeze–thaw cycles. To demonstrate encapsulation potential, β-carotene was used as a model lipophilic compound, achieving 94–98% efficiency and 85% and 68% retention after 14 days at 5 °C and 20 °C, respectively. All formulations achieved printing accuracies above 97%, maintaining geometry for over 24 h. This study establishes ZNP-GG HIPPEs as a clean-label, 3D-printable biocolloidal platform bridging interfacial engineering and digital food design for advanced nutraceutical delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahranjani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: