Why the study?
Is the implementation of the new Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management cost-effective in primary care?
Is the implementation of the new Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management cost-effective in primary care?
Implementing the new Dutch cardiovascular risk management guideline is cost-effective for individuals up to 70 years of age.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support Dutch CV guideline implementation up to age 70 in primary care; leaves open prospective validation of cost-effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: A new Dutch guideline for cardiovascular disease management substantially extends the number of individuals for whom treatment with statins and/or antihypertensive agents is recommended. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of implementing the new guideline at the national level. METHODS: First, the number of currently untreated individuals who would become eligible for cholesterol-lowering or antihypertensive treatment under the new guideline was estimated using data from a recent population study. Cost-effectiveness of treating this group of patients was then assessed using a mathematical model. RESULTS: Implementing the guideline in the age category 30-69 years would lead to an additional 465,000 individuals requiring treatment. Over a period of 20 years, the cumulative incidence of acute myocardial infarction in the whole population would drop by 3.0%, that of stroke by 3.9%, and all-cause mortality would drop by 0.9%. The lifetime cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated to be 15,000 Euro per quality-adjusted life year gained. In the age categories 70-79 years and 80 years or above, an additional 600,000 and 450,000 persons, respectively, would need to be treated, resulting in corresponding reductions in cumulative incidences of 14 and 18% (acute myocardial infarction), 17 and 22% (stroke), and 1.2 and 0.6% (all-cause mortality) with cost-effectiveness ratios of 20,800 and 32,300 Euro, respectively, per quality-adjusted life year. CONCLUSION: Complete implementation of the new guideline would lead to a considerable increase in the number of individuals requiring treatment. This would be cost-effective up to the age of 70 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kok et al. (2009) studied Cardiovascular disease risk (n=1,515,000). New Dutch guideline for cardiovascular disease management vs. Current practice was evaluated on Lifetime cost-effectiveness ratio (Euro per quality-adjusted life year gained) (15,000 Euro per QALY gained (age 30-69)).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: